Background
At its sixth meeting, the Conference of the Parties adopted the framework for effectiveness evaluation of the Stockholm Convention pursuant to Article 16, including terms of reference for the effectiveness evaluation committee. At its eighth meeting, the Conference of the Parties, among other things, welcomed the first report on the effectiveness evaluation of the Convention prepared in accordance with the framework adopted at the sixth meeting, including the conclusions and recommendations of the effectiveness evaluation committee. At its ninth meeting, the Conference of the Parties adopted the revised framework for effectiveness evaluation, and at its tenth meeting, the Conference of the Parties elected 10 members to serve on the effectiveness evaluation committee until the closure of the eleventh meeting of the Conference of the Parties. The second six-year evaluation cycle, using the adopted revised framework, took place between 2017 and 2023.
The effectiveness evaluation committee met from 12 to 14 April 2022 and from 1 to 4 November 2022, in Geneva, Switzerland, to conduct the effectiveness evaluation according to the adopted revised framework and to develop conclusions and recommendations as to the second effectiveness of the Stockholm Convention.
The executive summary of the effectiveness evaluation report is available here.
Overall outcomes of the second effectiveness evaluation
The committee concluded among other things, that the Convention provides an effective and dynamic framework to regulate POPs throughout their lifecycle, addressing the production, use, import, export, releases and disposal of these chemicals worldwide. The report of the second effectiveness evaluation notes progress that has occurred since the first evaluation but highlights that there continues to be ongoing issues that hinder the full implementation of the Convention. Mechanisms and processes required by the Convention to support Parties in meeting their obligations have all been put in place, with the exception of procedures and mechanisms on compliance. As for the first evaluation, a major challenge to the evaluation continues to be the limited data available from national reports and national implementation plans (NIPs), and recommendations have been made to address those and other implementation issues. Monitoring results indicate that regulations targeting POPs have succeeded in reducing levels of POPs in humans and the environment. For the initial POPs, concentrations measured in air and in human populations have declined and continue to decline or remain at low levels due to restrictions on POPs, some of which predated the Stockholm Convention and are now incorporated in it. For the newly listed POPs, concentrations are beginning to show decreases, although in a few instances, increasing and/or stable levels are observed. The priority areas for action to address implementation challenges identified in the second effectiveness evaluation include the following:
- Strengthening legal, administrative and other measures to control POPs;
- Addressing compliance, by establishing compliance procedures and mechanisms;
- Strengthening information collection;
- Strengthening environmentally sound management of POPs waste;
- Strengthening awareness-raising and information exchange;
- Strengthening the provision of technical assistance;
- Strengthening the provision of financial assistance;
- Improving effectiveness evaluation.
The report of the second effectiveness evaluation is available here, and the executive summary of the report can be accessed here.